list of ideological reading lists and FAQs

The following is a(n obviously incomplete) directory of indoctrinatory primers, catechisms, and introductory readers for various political points of view – left, right, lawful, chaotic, good, evil, sane, insane, whatever – which take the form of links to essays, blog posts, or books available easily online, and/or FAQs, which, while not precisely reading lists, seem to me to be in the same spirit. I have not read through most of these – though it’s certainly on the bucket list – and therefore cannot vouch for their quality, but have limited myself to pages that seem to show at least some degree of effort. Use to avoid epistemic closure, deepen your understanding of the One True Way, know thy enemy, or simply gawk at the moral diversity of mankind.

The organization of this is admittedly somewhat arbitrary, and will no doubt offend someone by placing them overclose to their enemy, or too far from whom they see as their natural comrades. Inocculatory readers and FAQs have been placed with their infectious counterparts, rather than from the point of view from which the attack has been launched; compilations of questions of fact have been placed with the traditions with which they are most readily associated, rather than the ideology of the compiler; either of these could have been otherwise. At the moment, in its incomplete state, this is not a terrible problem – the list is small, the organization hardly matters. As omissions are corrected and lacunae filled, it may become more of one.

Additions and correction appreciated.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to list of ideological reading lists and FAQs

  1. Multiheaded says:

    Senpai~ <3

  2. Multiheaded says:

    Also, that Jayman guy is going to object for sure!

    • Alexander Stanislaw says:

      Object to what? Does he read this blog?

      • Matthias says:

        Jayman is a black dude, but I have him listed under the “euphemisms for white supremacy” section. Nevertheless, and however ironically, his is probably the best pro-biological racism link roundup I could find, and I think it’s appropriate to place that in that section for reasons roughly analogous to the placement of Austrian economic stuff under right-libertarianism.

  3. JayMan says:

    It would be helpful if you got a few things at least right.

    As said above, I am Black. But I am not “alt-right,” (see here), indeed, I am liberal, even socialist (here). Nor am I “paleo.” See the above link.

    I am however pretty hereditarian. But that’s for one reason (the only reason that matters): it is correct.

    • Matthias says:

      Thanks, I’ve added a note, though am keeping the positionality now for the reasons mentioned. I also see you have an associated FAQ and have added that as well.

  4. Pingback: Hey, We Made a List of Lists! | Conservative Heritage Times

  5. Pingback: Off-the-Shelf Politics | Urban Future (2.1)

  6. Multiheaded says:

    That first linked meta-list is a hilarious illustration of the non-neutrality of everything. For example, if you’re frothing at the mouth at having Ken fucking Wilber but no Maoists, “neo-confucianism” under socialism, and a symmetrical alignment of black nationalism and white “nationalism”, then you’re like me or senpai.

  7. Multiheaded says:

    Also, lol @ Land following you.

  8. RP says:

    I love this list. Much thanks for creating it. May I suggest a link? Under “Left-Libertarian and Mutualist,” I would recommend adding: http://praxeology.net/all-left.htm

    As someone with heavy left-libertarian and mutualist inclinations, I’d say this is the most informative site/ list, and the most popular that I know of among free market left-libertarians.

Leave a Reply